720p ou 1080p qual e melhor how to#
720p ou 1080p qual e melhor 720p#
720p ou 1080p qual e melhor 1080p#
720p ou 1080p qual e melhor pro#

720p ou 1080p qual e melhor pro#

On my pro cameras I can shoot in either and I have carried out tests on both formats- there is no visual difference until you enlarge a section by a factor of 3 or more. ( I am in New Zealand so that is secondhand info from a USA film maker.)

720p ou 1080p qual e melhor 720p#

Some TV stations will insist on 720p specifically. I understand that much of the American broadcasting standard is also 720 although not all. That's why I said that 720p is the best native image to shoot in as no conversion or compression has to take place.

720p ou 1080p qual e melhor 1080p#

Just remember that youtube definition is 1080x 720p not 1920 x1080- so it will downgrade any 1080p image to 720p. It took me awhile to get around to uploading this one, but this is the one I shot at 720p/60. But the penalty is not as great as it is with the video, so using large is fine too! On the same subject, the lower resolution is still photos from the Phantom are more than fine also.will save you some disk and memory space. They simply refuse to mislead their customers and provide a worse image by advertising megapixels. It may also result in images which are actually worse.because for a given size of sensor, packing more pixels (dots, picture elements, light receivers) onto it results in less light hitting each one! That's why really good cameras have very large sensors.and it's why Apple uses only an 8MP sensor in their top of the line phones even though they could use one double or more the size. This will take up MUCH more memory, require more time to edit and assemble and may require you to get a new faster computer to process. This is becoming more and more important because we are now seeing 4K being pushed. If you are a pro or intend to do independent film production - it's another story.but you probably wouldn't have a Phantom in that case. There is really little (or no) difference in these cases. 720 video is actually 1,280Г—720 which is about one million pixels per frame or 3X the number (density) of what we considered 'broadcast' back in 2003.Д«ack to the tool analogy - these days most of our (at least my) audience looks at the videos on a smart phone, tablet or in a box (like youtube) inside a web page.

720p ou 1080p qual e melhor how to#

Most budding drone pilots are not going to know how to crop video - that's a step above the normal cutting and assembling. Pilots should think about this using the term 'appropriate technology' or 'proper tool for the job'. Rod is, of course, 100% correct in his statements. Then I got my Sony digital HD cameras and they were even better! They were 480 x 720 or so and it was thought that it could get no better! I remember when I got my Hi-8 camera and it was 100% stated that it was 'broadcast quality'. If you pixel peeped still frames, then a tiny difference could be seen on diagonals but seriously folks, unless you are playing back in a cinema you ain't gonna see it as they say! Hope this helps. I did actually show a client a 720p compared to a 1080p video on a 50' monitor and neither of us could see any difference in the moving imagery. Fo the best fluid artifact free video on this little camera stick to 720p/60- less blurring- less artifacts- quicker upload to youtube by a quantum amount. The only visual advantage in shooting at 1080 or even 4k is that it allows the videographer the opportunity to crop an image further, without losing too much definition. This gives artifacts and generally a worse image than a native 720p. Youtube is native 720p in HD setting, so if you go higher it has to convert your video and essentially downgrade it to 720p.

Glad to help folks! I have work in HD for many years and there is a lot of rubbish talked about what is best. That's a bet I would have lost and yeah, told me t.